Why
should I pay for consulting on a house being built for me? Aren't
the building code and the inspections carried out by municipal inspectors all
I need? The public generally believes that a house
built simply "to code" ensures a high quality home. READ
ON !!!! In some of our most expensive sub-divisions, this
perception has led to surprises and, in a few cases, ongoing litigation and frustration.......
even after having the house designed and built by professionals. The following
examples from some of these more expensive homes are instructive: (1) Seven
leaks in foundation during the first winter; high energy bills- hot water zoning
set up incorrectly- boiler operating very inefficiently- missing insulation; hardwood
flooring problems, roof leaks, 6 year litigation process (2) Siding and
trim popping away from the sheathing; multiple cracks in the basement floor; tile
cracking on the main floor- an extra support wall had to be built in the basement
8 months after construction (3) Exterior wall bowed outward more than an
inch (4) Roof system including trusses had to be replaced in the first year
at a cost of well over $100,000 (5) Severe rot in one wall and rim joist
system just 7 months after construction; house could not be adequately heated
on colder days of winter; mis-stated insulation levels; noisy ducting system (6)
Excessive cold air infiltration around gas fireplace; family room floor temperature
on cold days with strong north wind was only 13 degrees C. (7) Five building
code violations in $1.3 million home; siding problems within 3 years of construction (8)
At the 1 year warranty period, a $1.5+ million home needed $40,000+ in repairs/replacements)
Let's examine the building code: The following lines from the "Guide
to the Use of the 1995 National Building Code (NBC)" state the mandate
of the code:
"The NBC is essentially a set of minimum
provisions for the safety of buildings with reference to public health, fire protection
and structural sufficiency. It is not intended to be
a textbook on building design, advice on which should be sought from professionals."
(our emphasis) The 2005 NBC followed more strongly with: "The
NBC is not a textbook on building design or construction. The design of a technically
sound building depends on many factors beyond simple compliance with building
regulations. Such factors include the availability of knowledgeable practitioners
who have received appropriate education, training and experience and have some
degree of familiarity with the principals of good building practice and experience
using textbooks, reference manuals and technical guides."(our emphasis) Keeping
these statements in mind, it is easy to see why some higher end houses have disappointed
their owners. In the basics of the foundation, framing and some other items, these
houses were built just "to code"- the same level of the same code that
entry level housing is built to!!!! They were much larger houses with better finishes
but in the behind-the-walls basics, they just met the code. Remember, there
isn't a separate building code with higher standards for more expensive houses. For
years, we have recommended that certain items in a house be built beyond code
requirements. As seen from the above statements, the code developers now agree
with us!!! Most contractors and developers build the basic foundation, structure,
etc. only to code for pricing reasons. And........even if the house is
designed beyond code, a municipal inspector will only inspect to code- that is
all they are required to do! "Get a home inspector
involved immediately......I can't stress this enough"- Real estate
lawyer Chris Arnold of Mann and Partners in Ottawa, whose article appears(with
permission) on the Canadians for Properly Built Homes (CPBH) website. CPBH is
a not-for-profit corporation with a website that must be visited: www.canadiansforproperlybuilthomes.com
Call today for a consultation and find out where your new home should be improved
at the planning stage, not after you're living in it! |